Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

FREE Shipping

Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

Not Zero: How an Irrational Target Will Impoverish You, Help China (and Won't Even Save the Planet)

RRP: £99
Price: £9.9
£9.9 FREE Shipping

In stock

We accept the following payment methods


Quakers in Britain no longer use the term 'net zero' in our advocacy and campaigning work, except to refer to others' existing pledges which use this language. The Government should develop contingency plans, such as encouraging reduced consumer demand for high-carbon activities (e. We have arrived at the painful realisation that the idea of net zero has licensed a recklessly cavalier “burn now, pay later” approach which has seen carbon emissions continue to soar. Microsoft has pledged to be “carbon negative” by 2030, and by 2050 it aims to have removed from the air all the CO 2 the firm has emitted since it was founded in 1975.

For that reason and based on the findings of the Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor, Carbon Market Watch has come up with a set of recommendations for governments and corporations. This shows that big polluters now know they have to be seen to be serious about climate – but they're not making any noticeable shift away from their high-carbon core activities.The impact of climate change hit home for the British public this summer with temperatures rising to 40. However, their capacity is extremely limited – we still need to reduce our emissions to almost zero.

The author demonstrates that the people who have recommended and made these decisions have absolutely no idea how much they will cost, no idea of whether they will work or the technologies they are relying on will deliver and worst of all he shows how many of the measures that they have already put in place are actually increasing the amount of CO2 we pump into the atmosphere instead of reducing it. Clark shows that efforts to achieve the target will inevitably result in a huge hit to living standards, which will clobber the poorest hardest, and gift a massive geopolitical advantage to hostile superpowers such as China and Russia. By making such outlandish carbon neutrality claims, these corporations are not only misleading consumers and investors, they are opening themselves up to increasing legal and reputational liability.

However, "aught" and "ought" are also sometimes used as names for 0, in contradiction of their strict meanings.

Distribuimos y producimos contenido digital de información y entretenimiento y tenemos una gran selección de audiolibros, podcasts y series originales. While this analysis focuses mainly on households, businesses could also have benefitted from faster deployment. There is a need to maintain an explicit distinction between digit zero and letter O, [a] which, because they are both usually represented in English orthography (and indeed most orthographies that use Latin script and Arabic numerals) with a simple circle or oval, have a centuries-long history of being frequently conflated. The term “net zero” is used by the world’s biggest polluters and governments as a façade to evade responsibility and disguise their inaction or harmful action on climate change. A spate of recent studies are being used to claim a causal link for companies that offset their emissions between their use of carbon credits and their rate of internal decarbonisation.Government promised significant public spending in 2019 and committed to new policies last year, neither has yet occurred. In some fonts (and also in hand writing), where there is a need for a clear distinction a " slashed zero" ( ) is used.

  • Fruugo ID: 258392218-563234582
  • EAN: 764486781913
  • Sold by: Fruugo

Delivery & Returns


Address: UK
All products: Visit Fruugo Shop